From: on behalf of DC Secretaries
Subject: FW:
09/00909/REM Gavray Drive Bicester
Attention Mr Bob Duxbury
I see the
above application was registered on 7/7. Holidays have intervened and my
comments are somewhat tardy, but I think Dominic Woodfield has encapsulated most
of our concerns (his e-mails to you of 20/7 and 23/7 refer), which you are no
doubt addressing.
In
addition, there also appear to be are some anomalies in the
application.
- How can
the applicant claim that no definitive footpath/bridleway is affected and then
refer later to FP 129/3 and 129/4?
- Equally
how can they claim it is not a protected species site given the debates over the
marsh fritillary?
- Given
the background to the proposal, we would have thought an EIA was
mandatory.
yours
sincerely
Bruce
Tremayne
Chairman
CPRE Bicester/Ploughley District)