I am a member of the Bishop Blaize Support Group, a group
of villagers set up 3 years ago to monitor the position at the pub, and to work
towards restoring a well-loved and much-missed village amenity.
As you will
know, there have been been 2 applications for 'change of use to private
dwelling' in the past, and on both occasions the applications were refused on
the grounds that it "would be contrary to Policy S29 of the adopted Cherwell
Local Plan and Policy S26 of the Non-Statutory Cherwell Local Plan 2011, which
seek to prevent the loss of existing village facilities which serve the needs of
the community". In our opinion, this would lead to rural decline in the
future There are still many people who wish to purchase the pub, and to restore
it to its original state. (There was substantial damage due to a water
leak.) Very many villagers are keen to see it re-instated, and have set up
a 'fighting fund'. This surely proves that the pub is viable, and could be
the amenity is once was.
There is a current Order for Sale on the
Bishop Blaize, which has been suspended. The auction sale was to have been
on 22nd. July with Fisher German, and the amount of interest raised was
astonishing.
This seems a strange time to put in an application for
bed-and-breakfast accomodation. If it were
already operating as a public house there would be some sense in it.
If the planning permission were to be granted on the condition that the pub was
re-instated, then we would be wholeheartedly in approval, subject to some
reservations. However we need to look at this application in its own
right.
The plans are very misleading, and lack much detail. It is
very difficult to work out the exact sizes of the rooms, and they appear to be
very small. Why then, is there a staircase leading from the ground-floor
Bedroom 1, up to Bedrooms 2&3, effectively on the first floor, NOT as shown
in he plans? This is unnecessary, as access to Bedrooms 2&3 should be
at the car-park level. Also Bedroom 4 is only accessible through Bedrooms
2&3 which is clearly a non-starter, due to fire access, health & safety
etc. If bedroom 4 was not allowed, the roof-pitch could be considerably
lower, which would be more aesthetically pleasing in a conservation area.
There is a concern that this development could be converted to a private house
at a later date, and that is why the staircase has been included. If
this application is approved, we should like to see some stipulation that
the new additions can not be sold off separately from the licensed
premises.
Whilst on the subject of licensed premises, why is the
application at section 19 listed under C1 - 'hotels and halls of residence', and
not under A4 - 'drinking establishments' as one would have expected? (In a
letter from Mike Buxton to myself, dated 2/10/07, he states "The authorised use
of the Bishop Blaize is A4 (Use Classes Order 2005) It cannot be used for
purposes other than those falling into Classes A1, A2, A3, or A4 of the Use
Classes Order without planning permission". Does this mean that the Noquets are
effectively asking asking for change of use to C1 - hotels? If this is the
case, we are not happy about the back-door approach. Would this be
legal? Also, under section 18 - Residential Units why does it say NO, when
4 extra units are clearly being applied for?
We are also
very concerned that the application is in the name of "Bishop's End". As
we are aware, although it has been closed for 2 1/2 years, the pub
is still a licensed premises, "The Bishop's Blaize". Are they technically
the same property, or can they be separated as regards planning
applications? We have heard that the address "The Bishop's Blaize"
is not credit-worthy - could this be a contributory factor? Also, on the
Ordnance Survey map in the application, the words "Bishop's at Rest" are clearly
seen. Is this just another red herring?
I apologise for all these
questions, but we would appreciate some assistance from yourselves, as this
appears to be an application with many discrepancies, most of which might well
be lost to the man on the street. So, in principle, we would support any
application which meant that it might increase our chances of having our pub
open again. The villagers would use it and support it under new
management, and there are still people willing to buy it. However we do
have some reservations, depending on the outcome of our queries.
I look
forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,
Eileen
Haynes (p.p. Bishop Blaize Support Group)
Cubbs Cottage
Hawkes
Lane
Burdrop, OX15 5RL
(