From: Julie Shea
Sent: 27 April 2009 13:47
To: DC Secretaries
Subject: FW: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments
(09/00478/F)

 
-----Original Message-----
From: publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk [mailto:publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk]
Sent: 27 April 2009 11:11
To: Public Access DC Comments
Subject: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments (09/00478/F)

PublicAccess for Planning  - Application Comments (09/00478/F)

"Carol" has used the PublicAccess for Planning website to submit their comments on a Planning Application.  You have received this message because you are the Case Officer for this application or because this is a designated mailbox for PublicAccess comments submissions.

Comments were submitted at 27/04/2009 11:11:04 

Application Summary
-------------------
Application Number: 
09/00478/F

Address: 
OS Parcel 3873 North East Of Hillside House Street From Cropredy To Great Bourton Cropredy Oxfordshire



Proposal: 
The formation of 5 No. Touring Caravan pitches with associated road access across the site and foul waste disposal point. Erection of Timber post and Rail fencing to separate caravan pitches from paddock area. Erection of corrugated metal sheet fence as security screen to cow shed. Siting of secure storage container.

Case Officer: 
Caroline Roche

Customer Details
----------------
Name: 
Carol

Address: 
Valley View
Great Bourton
Banbury

Postcode: 





Comments
--------
Submission Type: 
Customer objects to the Planning Application.

Comments: 
I strongly object to this application because we feel in the village that we do not need another caravan site within half a mile of another one especially as it is so unsightly already being in the dip and so prominent.  Its not as if we are in Weymouth and really need another caravan site! I feel it would depreciate the housing market in the area too.  Apart from that, what about the drainage problems for the neighbour whom I believe has already had problems because of the hard core Mr Lapper has already laid down and his reply to that was "tough".  There is rubbish of some kind hiding behind a screen at the back of the field and this is unsightly to say the least.  I understand Mr Lapper has boastfully commented that he has contacts at CDC and I am wondering if this has made a huge difference in him getting away with what he already has done, i.e. the tank which by the way is metal and not like the example he submitted to you in a picture!  The lady in the adjacent field fought tooth and nail to get her barn erected for her horses so how can you justify Mr Lapper having authorisation for what he has ALREADY done without permission.  This is causing a lot of bad feeling in Great Bourton and Cropredy. 


PublicAccess for Planning.  (c) CAPS Solutions Ltd.