From:	Michelle Jarvis
Sent:	13 February 2008 10:29
To:	Stephanie Betts
Subject:	FW: 07/02291/OUT
______________________________________________ 
From: 	Tony Wilson  
Sent:	13 February 2008 10:28
To:	Michelle Jarvis
Subject:	RE: 07/02291/OUT

Michelle

I write to provide comments on the above application from a policy viewpoint.

The policy framework for the site is set by Policy H2 of the Structure Plan and Policies UH1-UH4 of the NSCLP 2011.

The area of the proposed new settlement generally accords with the boundary set out in the  RAF UH Comprehensive Planning Brief (CPB), although, I do note that there is some variation in this boundary at the western end of the proposal, north of Camp Road.

The application proposes the development of 1075 dwellings, including existing former military homes and includes provision of 30% affordable housing in accordance with the Policy H5 of the Adopted Local Plan (H7 - NSCLP 2011).

Approximately 1500 jobs (including existing) will be provided within the new settlement; the proposal provides approximately 15,700 sq m of B1 and B2 floorspace and 83,300 sq m of B8 use (incorporating the retention of some current car storage activity).  The level of employment provision is in general accordance with the Council's policy for the site.

A range of supporting facilities are also to be provided in accordance with policy requirements; these include, community and social facilities, local retailing, public house, primary school and employment uses.   These uses are listed as acceptable within Policy UH1 of the NSCLP and Structure Plan Policy H2.

However, I note that the proposal includes the change of use of building 74 to provide a hotel/conference centre (4,150 sq m); the policy framework does not include reference to the development of such a facility.  PPS6 states that such facilities are normally located within existing town centres or significant service centres; development of such facilities in rural location will only be considered appropriate if a proven need for a facility exists and the applicant has undertaken a sequential site search to demonstrate no more 'accessible' site is available.  I have examined the applicant's planning statement, but there is no reference to the need for the facility or evidence of a sequential site search.  While the proposed new settlement is expected to provide a range of facilities, a conference centre and hotel would normally be expected to locate within major towns or major rural service centres, such as Bicester.

Hope that these comments are useful.  Let me know if you need any further clarification.

Tony

Tony Wilson
Principal Planning Officer (Implementation)
Planning, Housing and Economy
Cherwell District Council
Extension: 1842
Direct Dial 01295 221842

mailto:tony.wilson@cherwell-dc.gov.uk
www.cherwell-dc.gov.uk

_____________________________________________ 
From: 	Michelle Jarvis  
Sent:	11 February 2008 09:22
To:	Tony Wilson; Martyn Swann; Rob Lowther; Philip Rolls; Paul Almond; Steven Newman (Economic Development)
Cc:	Stephanie Betts; Jenny Barker; Linda Rand
Subject:	Outstanding consultation responses on RAF Upper Heyford

Good morning all

I have been asked to chase up your responses on this planning application both to the original and amended plans.  From my list it would appear that your response is outstanding.

I would be grateful if you could let me have any comments in the next 48 hours so that our Consultants can incorporate this information into their Committee report.

If you have no comments to make please let me know so that I can keep the records up to date.

thanks

Michelle Jarvis BA (Hons) DipUP MRTPI
Planning Officer (Major Developments)
Planning, Housing & Economy
Cherwell District Council
Ext 1826
Direct Dial (01295) 221826
mailto:michelle.jarvis@cherwell-dc.gov.uk
www.cherwell-dc.gov.uk

erwell-dc.gov.uk www.cherwell-dc.gov.uk