From: Julie Shea
Sent: 26 January 2009 11:13
To: DC Secretaries
Subject: FW: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments
(08/02587/F)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk [mailto:publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk]
Sent: 23 January 2009 20:11
To: Public Access DC Comments
Subject: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments (08/02587/F)

PublicAccess for Planning  - Application Comments (08/02587/F)

"cliff gurr" has used the PublicAccess for Planning website to submit their comments on a Planning Application.  You have received this message because you are the Case Officer for this application or because this is a designated mailbox for PublicAccess comments submissions.

Comments were submitted at 23/01/2009 20:11:20 from 

Application Summary
-------------------
Application Number: 
08/02587/F

Address: 
3A And 3B
Cotefield Farm
Oxford Road
Bodicote
Banbury
Oxfordshire
OX15 4AQ


Proposal: 
Change of use for mixed use, storage, business and retail use to include sale of goods by auction

Case Officer: 
Graham Wyatt

Customer Details
----------------
Name: 
cliff gurr

Address: 
ballymartin
borris
co carlow
republic of ireland

Postcode: 
n/a



Comments
--------
Submission Type: 
Customer does not object to the Planning Application.

Comments: 
I am an auctioneer trading in Ireland, and have not been trading with JS Auctions for long, but have found them to be a good source of stock and a very honest genuine company to deal with.
I have read the pro`s and cons for there planning permision.
One of the points that seems to be constantly raised is the fact that auctions are the first and foremost site for recycling, I don`t think this can be denied by anyone, hence i dont think there can be an ethical objection to this buisness.
With reference to the carbon foot print of the traveling involved, I don`t believe anyone can object to a reduction in that, and which is what the said company is offering.
Finally and perhaps in this economic climate, the most important point is, why risk jobs when there seems no relevant objections.
Certainly I can understand the fact that we don`t put factory units or manifacturing plants in the countryside, but surely the original recycling company should be aloud to continue to trade and provide local employement.
with thanks for reading my comments and input on this permission, Cliff Gurr, a concerned customer and advocate of recycling.


PublicAccess for Planning.  (c) CAPS Solutions Ltd.