1.	APPLICATION SITE AND LOCALITY 

The Bungalow is an existing dwelling situated south-west of the village of Wendlebury.  The building is not listed, no listed buildings are in close proximity and the site is not in a Conservation Area.  Planning permission was granted on 08 July 2016 for the erection of a two storey extension to the dwelling under reference 16/00821/F, subject to conditions.  
2.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The current application seeks to discharge conditions 4 and 5 from the above application. 
3.	RESPONSE TO PUBLICITY

This application has not been publicised. 
4.	APPRAISAL
Condition 4 – required a schedule of materials and finishes.  This was submitted in the form of a plan labelled PROPOSED ELEVATIONS and email from the Applicant/Agent received on 30 November 2016.  
The schedule confirms that the window and door heads would have buff stone heads and cills, the front gable was to be clad with Cotswold stone, windows and doors grey UPVC, dull white monocouche render to remaining elevations, oak front door and frame, red clay tile roof to match that existing, hanging tiles to match the existing roof and black interlocking cladding on the side gables.  The dormers would be finished with lead. 
I consider these details to be acceptable in this context.  
Condition 5 – required the submission of enclosure details along the eastern boundary of the site.  This condition was applied due to the poor state of repair of the existing boundary fence and the requirement for this to be replaced with something of sufficient height to avoid harm to the privacy enjoyed by the adjacent neighbour from ground floor side facing openings.  Details were submitting the form of a plan labelled PROPOSED SITE/LOCATION PLAN and email from the Applicant/Agent dated 30 November 2016. 
The submitted details indicated that a 6ft close board fence would be erected, with possible trellis on top.  After asking the Agent to confirm the height of the possible trellis the Applicant confirmed on 30 November 2016 that no trellis would be installed.  They also indicated that the fence would be stained brown/creosote. 
I consider a 6ft close boarded fence to be sufficient to avoid a loss of privacy from ground floor openings.  
5.	CONCLUSION
I recommend that both conditions are discharged. 
6.	RECOMMENDATION
Condition 4 – Schedule of materials and finishes in accordance with plan labelled PROPOSED ELEVATIONS and email from the Applicant/Agent received on 30 November 2016. 

Condition 5 – Enclosure in accordance with plan labelled PROPOSED SITE/LOCATION PLAN and email from the Applicant/Agent dated 30 November 2016.

CASE OFFICER: Gemma Magnuson		DATE: 30 November 2016	
CHECKED BY:  Nathanael Stock	DATE: 30.11.2016