From: Public Access DC Comments Sent: 15 April 2008 11:41 To: DC Secretaries Subject: FW: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments (08/00899/F) Dan Birch IT Support Officer Planning Housing and Economy Cherwell District Council Ext 1872 Direct Dial (01295) 221872 mailto:danny.birch@cherwell-dc.gov.uk www.cherwell.gov.uk -----Original Message----- From: publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk [mailto:publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk] Sent: 12 April 2008 16:26 To: Public Access DC Comments Subject: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments (08/00899/F) PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments (08/00899/F) "Nicola Ruth Pitts" has used the PublicAccess for Planning website to submit their comments on a Planning Application. You have received this message because you are the Case Officer for this application or because this is a designated mailbox for PublicAccess comments submissions. Comments were submitted at 12/04/2008 16:26:24 Application Summary ------------------- Application Number: 08/00899/F Address: Begroke Science Park Access Road And Land Including Part OS 0004 And OS 0028 Adjacent To Woodstock Road Yarnton Oxfordshire Proposal: Widening and southern extension of access road, including public highway junctions alterations and associated work Case Officer: Bob Duxbury Customer Details ---------------- Name: Nicola Ruth Pitts Address: 9 Broad Field Road, Yarnton, Oxford Postcode: OX5 1UL Comments -------- Submission Type: Customer objects to the Planning Application. Comments: I agree with all the comments posted by John Burford plus; I will protest as much as possible about the fact that the council want to build a road that will allow people to look directly into my bedroom window. This is a gross invasion of my family's privacy. How can you push this through so quickly? Something so important to all the houses here, in Sandy Lane and on Woodstock Road should be given greater attention. Please tell me how we object in person, I would like to meet the planning council. The crossroads planned in this application will be a death trap. Please tell me exactly the reason why Option 3 that was approved in 2005 is not being used? This option does not affect anyone at all and is easily the best option. Nickie Pitts PublicAccess for Planning. (c) CAPS Solutions Ltd.