From: Public Access DC Comments
Sent: 15 April 2008 11:39
To: DC Secretaries
Subject: FW: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments
(08/00899/F)

 


Dan Birch
IT Support Officer
Planning Housing and Economy
Cherwell District Council
Ext 1872
Direct Dial (01295) 221872
mailto:danny.birch@cherwell-dc.gov.uk
www.cherwell.gov.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk [mailto:publicaccess@cherwell-dc.gov.uk]
Sent: 14 April 2008 22:09
To: Public Access DC Comments
Subject: PublicAccess for Planning - Application Comments (08/00899/F)

PublicAccess for Planning  - Application Comments (08/00899/F)

"Stephen Lee" has used the PublicAccess for Planning website to submit their comments on a Planning Application.  You have received this message because you are the Case Officer for this application or because this is a designated mailbox for PublicAccess comments submissions.

Comments were submitted at 14/04/2008 22:08:42 

Application Summary
-------------------
Application Number: 
08/00899/F

Address: 
Begroke Science Park Access Road And
Land Including Part OS 0004 And OS 0028 Adjacent To Woodstock Road Yarnton Oxfordshire



Proposal: 
Widening and southern extension of access road, including public highway junctions alterations and associated work

Case Officer: 
Bob Duxbury

Customer Details
----------------
Name: 
Stephen Lee

Address: 
Magnolia
13 Broad Field Road
Yarnton
Oxon

Postcode: 
OX5 1UL



Comments
--------
Submission Type: 
Customer objects to the Planning Application.

Comments: 
Can I please have answers to the following questions;
1 I understand planning approval was granted for option 3 from the design and access statement, why is The University of Oxford not building the access road in accordance with this option?
2 I understand that there complete resticutions on building on green belt land, why is this application even been considered.
3 Has the noise and air polution been considered, bearing in mind the close proximity the road has to a considerable number of houses/dwellings. Note this would not been the case if option 3 was used.
4 The area being considered in this application is arable farm land with a lot of natural wild life, the building of this road will no doubt have considerable detrimental effect on this.
5 I am of the very strong opinion that this application should be refused, there is no logical reason why option 3 should not be used, which has very little effect on neighbours and other environmental issues.


PublicAccess for Planning.  (c) CAPS Solutions Ltd.